There is a definite improvement from one generation to the next, but a couple Radeon cards drew even less power while generally performing better. Under a load the GTS 250 was a bit more energy efficient, drawing 16W less. Peak values were recorded from the Power Angel's display and recorded in the chart below.Īt idle, the GTS 250 was electrically identical to the 9800 GTX+, with the system drawing 135W (AC).
#Gts 250 gpu z windows#
Idle conditions were established by letting the system sit at the Windows desktop until a stable reading was achieved, and for load testing the DirectX 9 version of the Devil May Cry benchmark was executed. Since all other hardware remained the same, any change in the Wattage would be the due to the demand of the graphics card. Added detection for faked cards based on GTS 250, 9600 GT, NV41M Added detection for GeForce GTX 560 non-Ti, GT 520, GF116 based GTS 450, GT 550M, GeForce 315, GeForce 405, Quadro 2000 & 6000. Power consumption testing involved the use of a Seasonic Power Angel to monitor the AC Wattage drawn by the test system with each video card installed. GPU-Z 0.5.4 Girii deitir Considerably improved startup time on ATI cards, faster on NVIDIA, too. Too bad it doesn't have an integrated HDMI port to make it really appealing. The fan never surged in speed or noise, and this makes me see this card as a good choice for an HTPC. Other than passively cooled solutions, I don't think I have used a quieter video card in recent years. The unique heatpipe cooler no only kept the GPU nice and cool, it did so with absolutely minimal noise. The temperatures start out the lowest, and stay that way even under the load of some rather intense testing. All testing was completed on an open testbed with relatively still air in a room with an ambient temperature of 21C. GPU-Z is capable of logging current, minimum, and maximum temperature, so once all testing was completed, the maximum temperature was recorded. The load condition was established by running 3DMark Vantage two times back-to-back, followed by two back-to-back sessions of the DirectX 9 version of a benchmark available for the Devil May Cry game. The idle condition was established by recording the temperature after leaving the system for 30 minutes with only GPU-Z running. Higher is better for these results, and the highest possible score is 7.9.Īs I expected, the GTS 250 put up the same numbers as the 9800 GTX+, which happen to be the lowest of the cards on hand.Thermal testing involved monitoring the various GPU temperatures by running GPU-Z with logging enabled. We will look at the gaming graphics and desktop graphics scores, as they are the only ones that should change from one graphics card to the next. Windows 7 has a simple benchmark built in to analyze the performance of a few system components. Each card was run through the following tests, and the system was rebooted between each run.
#Gts 250 gpu z windows 7#
The tests to be executed include a look at the Windows 7 Experience rating, one synthetic benchmark, four benchmarks included with 3D games, thermal testing, and some power consumption testing. All Nvidia based cards used the Windows 7 64-Bit approved version of Forceware 185.85 (and PhysX was enabled). » Leadtek Limited WinFast 896MB GTX260 EXTREME+Īll Radeon based cards used the Windows 7 64-Bit approved version of the Catalyst Control Center version 9.5. The 512MB version has memory at 2200MHz.įor comparison purposes, the ENGTS250 1GB GTS 250 was tested against the following other cards: Some sites (like 's listing) indicate 2200MHz, and at one point I wound up on the specifications for the 512MB version of this card at the ASUS site, despite not trying to navigate there intentionally. I was also curious to see whether the memory was going to be listed at 2200MHz, or 2000MHz. One issue is that GPU-Z apparently can't distinguish 55nm technology yet, and lists it as 65nm. The screenshot below provides details regarding the ASUS ENGTS250 1GB GTS 250 video card by 's GPU-Z.įor the most part, the data shown above matches what is indicated on the list of official specifications. » Maxtor MaxLine III 250GB SATA 3Gbps hard drive » Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R LGA 1366 X58 ATX motherboard (BIOS F6) A system with the following components was used for this review:
0 kommentar(er)
